Admissions policies that take class into account, rather than race, are getting a renewed push as a win-win solution. The contention is that they more fully serve the goal of diversity in higher education and provide a progressive way to resolve an enduring conflict that has now returned to the Supreme Court in a case about race-conscious admissions at the University of Texas at Austin.
But a crucial premise of the class-over-race argument is wrong. It is not possible to maintain the same level of racial diversity in higher education while applying a race-blind admissions policy. Class-based admissions generally reduce the number of black and Hispanic students. To maintain or build the levels of racial diversity on selective campuses, it is necessary to maintain race-conscious admissions.
While there are higher shares of blacks and Hispanics among low-income Americans, their smaller shares of the whole population mean that whites make up by far the largest portion of low-income families. As Alan Krueger, now head of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, and his co-authors wrote in 2006, “The correlation between race and family income, while strong, is not strong enough to permit the latter to function as a useful proxy for race in the pursuit of diversity.” (New York Times)
Easy Related Posts
Experts: K-12 Population Shift Toward Students of Color Will Shed Light on Resource Inequalities
For the first time ever, non-Hispanic Whites are projected to make up less than 50 ...read more
HBCU: The Black college experience
The Higher Education Act of 1965, defines a Historically Black College and University or HBCU ...read more
Why race-based affirmative action in college admissions still matters
The Supreme Court has nearly abolished the obligation of selective colleges and universities to give ...read more
Black Men Need More Education Than White Men to Get the Same Jobs
Meet Steve and Kwame, two fictional guys who just graduated from the University of Maryland. ...read more