Admissions policies that take class into account, rather than race, are getting a renewed push as a win-win solution. The contention is that they more fully serve the goal of diversity in higher education and provide a progressive way to resolve an enduring conflict that has now returned to the Supreme Court in a case about race-conscious admissions at the University of Texas at Austin.
But a crucial premise of the class-over-race argument is wrong. It is not possible to maintain the same level of racial diversity in higher education while applying a race-blind admissions policy. Class-based admissions generally reduce the number of black and Hispanic students. To maintain or build the levels of racial diversity on selective campuses, it is necessary to maintain race-conscious admissions.
While there are higher shares of blacks and Hispanics among low-income Americans, their smaller shares of the whole population mean that whites make up by far the largest portion of low-income families. As Alan Krueger, now head of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, and his co-authors wrote in 2006, “The correlation between race and family income, while strong, is not strong enough to permit the latter to function as a useful proxy for race in the pursuit of diversity.” (New York Times)
Easy Related Posts
For historically black colleges, quiz bowl can mean higher profile
When D'Ondre Swails went to college, he looked for a way to replicate the energy ...read more
There's an unprecedented crisis facing America's historically black colleges
Across the US, historically black colleges and universities are struggling financially — and the nation's ...read more
Michelle Obama, Race and the Ivy League
In 1988, a group of black students at Harvard Law School compiled a report designed ...read more
Shades of segregated past in today’s campus troubles
Demands to rename Tillman Hall at Clemson University, the circulation of a video showing a ...read more