Admissions policies that take class into account, rather than race, are getting a renewed push as a win-win solution. The contention is that they more fully serve the goal of diversity in higher education and provide a progressive way to resolve an enduring conflict that has now returned to the Supreme Court in a case about race-conscious admissions at the University of Texas at Austin.
But a crucial premise of the class-over-race argument is wrong. It is not possible to maintain the same level of racial diversity in higher education while applying a race-blind admissions policy. Class-based admissions generally reduce the number of black and Hispanic students. To maintain or build the levels of racial diversity on selective campuses, it is necessary to maintain race-conscious admissions.
While there are higher shares of blacks and Hispanics among low-income Americans, their smaller shares of the whole population mean that whites make up by far the largest portion of low-income families. As Alan Krueger, now head of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, and his co-authors wrote in 2006, “The correlation between race and family income, while strong, is not strong enough to permit the latter to function as a useful proxy for race in the pursuit of diversity.” (New York Times)
Easy Related Posts
Solving race inequities through education
This has been a time of difficult introspection for the nation and region as frustration ...read more
ACLU lawsuit: Ferguson school board excludes blacks
The American Civil Liberties Union sued Missouri's Ferguson-Florissant School District in federal court Thursday to ...read more
How School Suspensions Disproportionately Target Black Girls
Last year, 12-year-old Mikia Hutchings was suspended from school. She spent her summer on probation, ...read more
The Hypocrisy of Revitalization: Universities in Black Communities
My stint with higher education began at a massive public institution—the University of Illinois—where I ...read more