Op-Ed: President Barack Obama is truly a genius

Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq.

- If anyone had any doubts, after listening to President Barack Obama address the Class of 2009 at the Notre Dame graduation, you have to admit he’s a genius. He didn’t in any way back away from the controversy the media had whipped up for the past few weeks regarding his position on a woman’s right to choose.

President Obama went right in and addressed a woman’s right to choose, the war, HIV/AIDS, handling differences of opinion–you name it! He acknowledged the conflicts we have on many issues, but challenged the class to find a way to live together as one human family. He explained how community service can break down walls and foster cooperation for the greater good.

He challenged the class to hold firm to their faith and allow it to guide them on their journey. He said that it’s possible to engage in vigorous debate while having differences of opinion—yet work through areas of conflict together. We do that by extending the same presumption of good faith to others that we want extended to us.


We don’t have to agree on every issue to find common ground on which we can work together. If we disagree on a woman’s right to choose, we can work together to make abortion less necessary. When a woman decides to carry an unplanned pregnancy to full term, we can work together to create health policies that respect women. We can work together on adoption. We can work together on ways to give the child a better life.

If we recognize our own imperfections and cease clinging to our worn out prejudices, we can resolve so many of the challenges on which President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama are offering brilliant leadership. They’ve called us to community service. We all can serve our nation and our world in a way that makes a positive difference—individually and collectively.

In the story of Miss Jane Pittman, we are told that people are always looking for somebody to come and lead them….and the Lord has always obliged in some way or another. Anytime a child was born, the old people looked the child in the face and asked if that child was the ONE.

Yes, the Lord has obliged us with the ONE, with a President who is a genius, to lead us. If only we could have a few days of less criticism and questioning the motives of every move he makes…If only we could find a willingness to roll up our own sleeves to do what we can to make this a better nation, a better world, ears have not heard and eyes have not seen the good we could accomplish together! Each one of us can be the ONE to lead our own family or our own community! What a blessing so much leadership would be for the common good

Dr. E. Faye Williams, Esq. is the National Chair of the National Congress of Black Women, Inc.

  • jojo

    What a cloying piece of drivel this article is. There's nothing substantial or insightful or even noteworthy – no, make that …newsworthy. Unsubstantiated fawning may be “black” but it's not political and it certainly ain't news.

    He's a 'genius' because he addressed issues people were concerned about? He's a 'genius' because he clarified his own opinion on issues people were asking him about anyway? That doesn't make sense. If I ask you a question, even a controversial one, and you answer it openly – does that make you a genius, too??? And, excuse me, the media “whipped up” this right to life controversy only in the past few weeks? What did they try to “trump” Barack by conjuring up a false scandal so he'd be booed during his speech? If my memory serves me correctly, and it does, a woman's right to choose has been a controversy for EVERYONE since before Roe vs. Wade. I mean, those women weren't getting killed having illegal abortions in back allies in the early 1900s for fun. So, I don't think it's something the media conveniently “whipped up” to tear down, Barack. A little background research would have shed some light on this century old conflict.

    You made some points, but you didn't substantiate them so they have no power, no meaning, and no weight. “He explained how community service can break down walls and foster cooperation for the greater good.” Okay – explain HOW community service is supposed to do that. DId he say we should volunteer in communities other than our own? Volunteer doing what, for whom, and where?

    And the Miss Jane Pittman part came out of left field. And what has that to do with the part of the Lord? DId Miss Jane Pittman say ALL of that? If so – maybe it should be in quotes. Or did you add your own explanation to the end of that? Did you paraphrase? It's unclear as to what parts of that statement (if any) belong to Miss Pittman or you. And what exactly is a “presumption of good faith”? If you're gonna tell people the President said that's what we need to be doing, you should at least explain to them what doing that looks like. Put it in a context that people can understand – otherwise, it's just regurgitated rhetoric..aka… empty words.

    How exactly do we work together to make abortion less necessary?? Do you see what I mean by empty words. The phrase actually does not make sense.

    And the Lord obliged us with the ONE what…exactly? Another grandiose statement that makes no sense and is not substantiated. You DO realize, don't you, that the next ONE – the ONE who unifies the whole world and makes everything better will be exposed as the anti-Christ, DON'T YOU? And if Barack is the ONE – I'd think you'd wanna do anything BUT endorse him. You should probably read the Revelation of John again to make sure you know what being the ONE really means. I for one, hope he's not the ONE.

    I understand your respect and admiration for the man, but dang – if this is what passes for news, politics, or intelligent discussion/debate in the black community – we're screwed. And trust – I'm not ripping on Barack – I'm ripping on this poorly written attempt at an article that assumes it's offering wisdom and news, but is, in reality, doing nothing of the kind. Please research your “articles” even if they ARE just op-ed pieces. Put a few facts and figures behind them, contextualize the piece, and by all means – warn the reader if you're just going to put some Obama “fanboy” stuff up. We have enough “fanboys” and “fangirls” in the balck community who neither think in depth or act with passion. They're all surface. We HAVE to start training up real thinkers, real visionaries, and real commentators who will motivate the people to do better – not just appeal to their senses.

    Ugh. Okay – I'm done. I just wonder – when the hell will we ever get it together??? Every race can come over here and do better than we can with less and here we are still at ground zero worrying about, blogging about, singing about, rapping about stuff that doesn't even matter. And the stuff that does – the stuff that effects our future and our children's children's children – we just write this kind of bubblegum nonsense that makes you “feel” like you read something and learned something when you didn't.

  • jojo

    What a cloying piece of drivel this article is. There's nothing substantial or insightful or even noteworthy – no, make that …newsworthy. Unsubstantiated fawning may be “black” but it's not political and it certainly ain't news.

    He's a 'genius' because he addressed issues people were concerned about? He's a 'genius' because he clarified his own opinion on issues people were asking him about anyway? That doesn't make sense. If I ask you a question, even a controversial one, and you answer it openly – does that make you a genius, too??? And, excuse me, the media “whipped up” this right to life controversy only in the past few weeks? What did they try to “trump” Barack by conjuring up a false scandal so he'd be booed during his speech? If my memory serves me correctly, and it does, a woman's right to choose has been a controversy for EVERYONE since before Roe vs. Wade. I mean, those women weren't getting killed having illegal abortions in back allies in the early 1900s for fun. So, I don't think it's something the media conveniently “whipped up” to tear down, Barack. A little background research would have shed some light on this century old conflict.

    You made some points, but you didn't substantiate them so they have no power, no meaning, and no weight. “He explained how community service can break down walls and foster cooperation for the greater good.” Okay – explain HOW community service is supposed to do that. DId he say we should volunteer in communities other than our own? Volunteer doing what, for whom, and where?

    And the Miss Jane Pittman part came out of left field. And what has that to do with the part of the Lord? DId Miss Jane Pittman say ALL of that? If so – maybe it should be in quotes. Or did you add your own explanation to the end of that? Did you paraphrase? It's unclear as to what parts of that statement (if any) belong to Miss Pittman or you. And what exactly is a “presumption of good faith”? If you're gonna tell people the President said that's what we need to be doing, you should at least explain to them what doing that looks like. Put it in a context that people can understand – otherwise, it's just regurgitated rhetoric..aka… empty words.

    How exactly do we work together to make abortion less necessary?? Do you see what I mean by empty words. The phrase actually does not make sense.

    And the Lord obliged us with the ONE what…exactly? Another grandiose statement that makes no sense and is not substantiated. You DO realize, don't you, that the next ONE – the ONE who unifies the whole world and makes everything better will be exposed as the anti-Christ, DON'T YOU? And if Barack is the ONE – I'd think you'd wanna do anything BUT endorse him. You should probably read the Revelation of John again to make sure you know what being the ONE really means. I for one, hope he's not the ONE.

    I understand your respect and admiration for the man, but dang – if this is what passes for news, politics, or intelligent discussion/debate in the black community – we're screwed. And trust – I'm not ripping on Barack – I'm ripping on this poorly written attempt at an article that assumes it's offering wisdom and news, but is, in reality, doing nothing of the kind. Please research your “articles” even if they ARE just op-ed pieces. Put a few facts and figures behind them, contextualize the piece, and by all means – warn the reader if you're just going to put some Obama “fanboy” stuff up. We have enough “fanboys” and “fangirls” in the balck community who neither think in depth or act with passion. They're all surface. We HAVE to start training up real thinkers, real visionaries, and real commentators who will motivate the people to do better – not just appeal to their senses.

    Ugh. Okay – I'm done. I just wonder – when the hell will we ever get it together??? Every race can come over here and do better than we can with less and here we are still at ground zero worrying about, blogging about, singing about, rapping about stuff that doesn't even matter. And the stuff that does – the stuff that effects our future and our children's children's children – we just write this kind of bubblegum nonsense that makes you “feel” like you read something and learned something when you didn't.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Switch to our mobile site